Updated July 8, 2026
The short answer: Smith.ai is the better value of the two for most small businesses β it blends AI with human receptionists from about $95/month for 50 calls, while Ruby is a pure human answering service at $245/month for just 50 minutes. Ruby wins on white-glove human touch; Smith.ai wins on price per conversation and extras like chat. Both are demo/quote-led services rather than self-serve software.
Yes. Smith.ai starts at roughly $95/month for 50 receptionist calls (~$1.90 per call), while Ruby starts at $245/month for 50 minutes (~$4.90 per minute). A typical 3-4 minute call on Ruby's meter costs several times more than the same call on Smith.ai.
Smith.ai books appointments as part of its receptionist service. Ruby focuses on answering, message-taking, and call transfers β appointment scheduling is not its core workflow.
Not really β both are sold through demos and quotes rather than self-serve signup. If you want to try an AI receptionist yourself in minutes, that's where self-serve AI products (like Rinqly, from $49/month with 60 free minutes) differ.
Yes β pure-AI receptionists cost a fraction of human or hybrid services. Rinqly, for example, answers unlimited simultaneous calls 24/7, books appointments, and starts at $49/month for 140 minutes, with a free trial and no sales call required.
The third option
Both Smith.ai and Ruby charge human-service prices because humans are in the loop. If your calls are mostly routine β hours, bookings, FAQs β a pure-AI receptionist does the same job from $49/month: Rinqly answers every call 24/7, books straight into your calendar, and also covers website chat and outbound follow-ups from one agent. Setup takes about 5 minutes, with 60 free minutes to test it on your own business.